paparazzi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Paparazzi-devel] which stabilization subsystem is more stable ?


From: Eltonwu
Subject: [Paparazzi-devel] which stabilization subsystem is more stable ?
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 19:57:28 -0700 (MST)

In the wiki page, I found 4 stabilization subsystem:

int_quat
float_quat
int_euler
float_euler

In my opinion,performance of float is more powerful than int. Am I right?
another question is which is more stable between quat and euler? In the wiki
page I found quat is no gimal lock so it can fly in regimes close or at
these singularities (e.g. acrobatics or transitioning vehicles). I just want
fly more stable and take pictures.so It make more sense to use eluer instead
of quat (search the source code I found the kroozSD use the int_euler, so I
think euler is more stable than quat?)


Thank you very much in advance



--
View this message in context: 
http://lists.paparazziuav.org/which-stabilization-subsystem-is-more-stable-tp16577.html
Sent from the paparazzi-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]