[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] UBlox UCenter Module Port Configuration
From: |
Piotr Esden-Tempski |
Subject: |
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] UBlox UCenter Module Port Configuration |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:13:05 -0800 |
Hi Luke,
The UART3 got swapped with UART1 between Lisa/M V1.0 and V2.0.
Depending on the Lisa/M board file you are using in your airframe file and in
real the default UART port used for GPS will be either UART1 for Lisa/M V1.0
and port UART3 for Lisa/M V2.0.
I hope this helps.
Cheers,
Piotr
P.S. Here is a port diagram for Lisa/M V2.0 for comparison:
http://wiki.paparazziuav.org/wiki/File:LisaM_V2_0_top_labeled.png
On Feb 10, 2014, at 9:09 AM, Luke Ionno <address@hidden> wrote:
> Ben,
>
> I'm using UART3 as per the diagram here:
> http://wiki.paparazziuav.org/wiki/File:LisaM_V1_0_top_labeled.png
>
> Note that the UART3 TX pin is actually the PC10 pin, on the header to the
> left. (In effect, this is identical to the LISA/M 2.0 configuration...
> Which, come to think of it, works just fine with the UCenter module... So,
> it appears I've blundered somewhere else; seems I'm barking up the wrong
> tree!)
>
> -Luke
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
> Ben Laurie
> Sent: Sunday, February 9, 2014 5:10 PM
> To: Paparazzi UAV devel list
> Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] UBlox UCenter Module Port Configuration
>
> On 9 February 2014 21:42, Luke Ionno <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> I've got a question regarding using the UCenter configuration module,
>> on a Lisa/M 1.0. I've got the GPS connected to UART3 (long story, but
>> I don't have the option to use UART2), and obviously, the UCenter
>> module isn't working. For the time being, I'm using a LEA-5H, so I
>> simply configured it using the desktop UCenter program, but I'd like
>> to use a UBlox NEO-6 I've got, which seems to achieve better accuracy;
>> however, it doesn't have flash memory, thus, I need to use the UCenter
> module.
>>
>>
>>
>> Is there a workaround, to persuade the module to point at UART3?
>
> This is the change I made to get it to support USB. You probably need to do
> something similar. But ... according to my reading there isn't a UART3, so
> ... not sure exactly what you're doing.
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>>
>> -Luke
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel