|
From: | Chris |
Subject: | [Paparazzi-devel] adc injected vs regular chanels |
Date: | Thu, 01 Aug 2013 22:36:43 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 |
For anyone that might know:Is there any particular reason (timing, flexibility, etc) that makes the paparazzi stm32 code to use injected channels (max 4 for each adc converter) for the adc and not the regular adc conversion method (scan etc)?
Chris
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |