paparazzi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Paparazzi-devel] OS X Usage Poll


From: Stephen Dwyer
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] OS X Usage Poll
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:09:41 -0600

Hello all,

Just a warning the OS X installation is probably broken at the moment, and the binary installer links are also broken. This is being worked on, but takes time. Please let me know if there are any major concerns.

Thanks,
-Stephen Dwyer


On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 3:02 AM, Gerard Toonstra <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi Stephen,

I haven't tried the Mac OSX build yet, but I'm using a gstreamer framework build available from here:

http://docs.gstreamer.com/display/GstSDK/Installing+on+Mac+OS+X

This contains a number of glib, gio, libxml, z and other libraries that paparazzi might need. It could be one way
to reduce the complexity and build times?

They also have a build environment called "Cerbero". Instructions available here:

http://docs.gstreamer.com/display/GstSDK/Building+from+source+using+Cerbero

Never tried building that either, I just went with the packages.

Rgds,

Gerard


On Mar 7, 2013, at 4:01 AM, Stephen Dwyer <address@hidden> wrote:

Hello,

Thanks to those who have replied so far.

I will try and get the macports setup working more smoothly again with some updates and also try to get the binaries working properly again. They are a bit finicky to build unfortunately, and take a LONG time. Is a binary installer the preferred method?

For Mountain Lion, it is a known issue, and several people have tried to solve the problem unsuccessfully thus far. Unfortunately I don't have ML, but may investigate at a later date. You can still run paparazzi, you just can't use paparazzi center to start the different agents; it must all be done manually from the command line.

Thanks,
-Stephen Dwyer


On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:15 AM, Lothar Arndt <address@hidden> wrote:
Hello Stephen,

I am on Mountain Lion (10.8.2) and tried to get Paparazzi so work first with the binary installer and then with macports. Both didn't work, don't know the details anymore, but moved to a Ubuntu VM and the installation of Paparazzi was simple and straight forward.

However, I would prefer Paparazzi on OS X.

Kind regards

Lothar


On 06/03/2013, at 9:49 AM, Stephen Dwyer <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hello Everyone,
>
> I was just curious as to how many people are currently using OS X for Paparazzi.
>
> If so, did you use the binary installer or the macports installation? Which version of OS X you are using?
>
> In addition, how many people would like to use OS X, but can't seem to get it to work properly, or can not because they are using a version other than Snow Leopard or Lion?
>
> Any input as to your experiences would be appreciated to determine the time that may be spent improving OS X support.
>
> Thanks,
> -Stephen Dwyer
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel


_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel


_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel


_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]