paparazzi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Paparazzi-devel] whether plan use backstepping to replace PID.


From: Christophe De Wagter
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] whether plan use backstepping to replace PID.
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:22:29 +0100

It would be great to see more advanced controllers being tested.

Paparazzi is ideal for this as you can make your own controller in a new subsystem without the need to change anything else:

See for instance the 4 added files:

*subsystem makefile: (tells which files to compile and which arguments to use)
https://github.com/paparazzi/paparazzi/blob/master/conf/firmwares/subsystems/fixedwing/control_energy.makefile

*code itself
https://github.com/paparazzi/paparazzi/blob/v4.2/sw/airborne/firmwares/fixedwing/guidance/energy_ctrl.c and h

*settings file to change parameters inflight
https://github.com/paparazzi/paparazzi/blob/v4.2/conf/settings/control/ctl_energy.xml

-Christophe 


On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:55 AM, hu zhangli <address@hidden> wrote:
at present i am researching about adaptive control .
anybody could supply some useful material. thanks

_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]