|
From: | P.J.S. Danneels |
Subject: | Re: [Paparazzi-devel] StratoBlimp, a challenging UAV project |
Date: | Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:29:53 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 |
Hi Guys,
GPS: Thank you for the replies, we are not that concerned with the GPS we're confident that we can find modules that work above the 60k ft limit and our design will probably not be able to survive the speed limit of 999knots anyways. But we know about the limitations and we are taking it into account. GPSboomerang: Yes, the GPS boomerang is a very nice example, but we can't find any evidence that it went above 20km altitude. So we basically want to make a more advanced GPSboomerang. Questions to the community: - Long range communications, our biggest unknown at the moment. We're looking at the Digi XBee Pro 868 module, with high gain antenna's and a directional ground station with auto tracking. This could be enough for most missions but occasionally the drift can be a lot bigger. Do any of you have experience with this module, these kind of antenna's and tracking setup? Or are we overlooking other types of communication. We've also come across the radio amateur bands for example the 70cm or the 2m band but then you have to do with licenses again. Any input on the communication problem is much appreciated. - Is there any data available in how much cpu power is generally used by paparazzi on the STM32 and LPC2148 models? So do we have a lot of spare cpu power to do some fancy route calculations. or is it close to its limitations already? - digital HD camera's. It's off course possible to strap a GoPro camera on the craft but that's not very weight/volume efficient in my opinion. Have you guys successfully implemented tiny HD camera's? Best regards, Pieter On 20/11/2012 12:42, Hector Garcia de Marina wrote:
|
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |