|Subject:||Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Successful flights with total energy control loops !|
|Date:||Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:32:51 +0100|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1|
On 28/09/12 08:21, Christophe De Wagter wrote:
Energy Control refers to altitude+aispeed in the control loop and not voltage+current.Thanks. I guess the POWER_CTL_BAT_NOMINAL field in vertical_control made me think that it would care about battery stuff as well.
I don't mind testing the bleeding edge. Especially since I had to rethink control anyway for use of airspeed sensor.
But yea, battery sense is essential. I have had so many near disasters because of low battery before. Not a risk I like to take right now.
I will test that. Thanks.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|