paparazzi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Paparazzi-devel] circular polarized antenna hype


From: Tilman Baumann
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] circular polarized antenna hype
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:03:13 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0

On 23/07/12 14:47, Marc Schwarzbach wrote:
Hi Tilman,

the basic principle of loss of signal strength when two linear antennas are out 
of phase applys to XBee, too, of course. So you could avoid that by spending a 
constant loss of 3dB when using a circular polarized antenna on one side.

In my oppinion it makes sense when using a higher gain circular on the ground 
(patch or helix) and a standard omni on the plane.
I´m a little sceptical with all the hype around cloverleaves and so on... Also 
look fragile when used on the plane :-)

True. Eventually I would like to invest in a antenna tracker at the ground station.

I have no problems with 2.4GHz Xbees with standard wire antennas up to 1km.

Do you have problems with your connection?

Not really. But since I fly 2.4Ghz the range is not terribly long and I wonder if I might get better reception at the fringes of the range.

Anyway. I just wonder if the wondrous advantages the FPV guys keep harping around would apply to us. :)



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]