Re: [Paparazzi-devel] FlightGear not working

[Eric Parsonage]

It is the right solution, otherwise their interface is broken.


On 07/12/2011, at 5:47 PM, Eduard Iten wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Am 07.12.2011 07:58, schrieb Eric Parsonage:
>> The correct solution is for us to persuade FlightGear to pack there
>> structure consistently in the same way for both 32 and 64 bit
>> versions.
>> 
>> We sometimes run flightgear on another computer which may be either
>> 32 or 64 bit.
> 
> Hi Eric,
> 
> that's true. I think I'll file a bug to FlightGear this evening.
> Especially running the GCS on my 64bit laptop and FG on my 32bit
> laptop is a plan for the future, and then I don't like to change the
> header file each time I change the setup.
> 
> Regards, Edi
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> 
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO3xMZAAoJELogHzrHo8cKWJAH/2C5yV9zLjD2PqEVNkSHRR6W
> jrLV9eomayUCah4RfGwpS3aQLmPfo9B+uI3AX9g10kuLYQcrMFSFzaOVTpFNveY4
> pcq6Xv4SyTCpiQdW3/nmPaYie8Z2iBX6ubf1J03wbNM5SQ8kIbxg5AZmIQixn+bp
> gMt8a6wcUAzQtZbw9AFHhqHDLfambJHYJENZcU/4CYbUYPTjrwF1YnMhBJsqJbdn
> VnpSFeLp56AV07Wdg+gyXkjnGiX37bqAYtmTtgdxML/UFAnMQJSpSwqU5kzcmXId
> MfAtcwsNanKd0NskKyFuNJqY2bj3VW4Kv2THJ0UGhtKwMPU2xKKylBG7gY2IrxM=
> =GGs2
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel