Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Umarim

[Reto Büttner]

Hi David,

great. Let us know as soon as you can deliver Umarim.

Cheers, Reto

2011/10/7 David Conger <address@hidden>:
> It will not take long to get the PCBs on the PPZUAV web store. Gerbers were
> only just released. -David
> On Oct 6, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Heinrich Warmers wrote:
>
> Dear Michel and  Matthieu,
> you made a wonderful and great work with your design.
> I hope, that i can by the PCBs somewhere soon.
>
> Regards
> Heinrich
>
>
>
> Michel GORRAZ schrieb:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We design what we need.
> We release because we are happy when somewhere someone need it also.
> And the more people use it, the more happy we are :)
>
> @+
> Michel
>
> 2011/10/6 Gareth Roberts <address@hidden>
>>
>> Hi Héctor,
>>
>> I'm with Marc on this.  I appreciate that Lisa/M or L are technically
>> more powerful, and have an IMU available as an external board.
>>
>> I see the two as complimentary.
>>
>> I like the tiny form factor of the Umarim, the fact that it is pretty
>> much backward compatible with all my airframe files, the onboard IMU and
>> the fact they are less of a hassle to get made up, the firmware is
>> stable and I don't like programming via JTAG.  I see it as the spiritual
>> successor of the Tiny.
>>
>> Whilst the Lisa is more powerful, for this project I don't *need* the
>> power.  I need the plane to stay the right way up and carry out a
>> flightplan.  A standard Tiny/TWOG does everything I want already, I'd
>> just rather have some Umarim's because they are smaller, include IMU,
>> and they get rid of the dreaded 5V switchmode PSU.
>>
>> The STM32 gives a bit more grunt, but if I need more processing grunt
>> I'll lift a beagleboard or gumstix anyway and have access to a proper
>> operating system, drivers, orders of magnitude more power & simpler
>> debugging.
>>
>> My two pence,
>> --G
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 14:21 +0200, Hector Garcia de Marina wrote:
>> > Hello all,
>> >
>> > I have been checking out the board and I really like the design and
>> > layout of the Umarim. On the other hand Lisa/L is based on CortexM3.
>> > In my opinion ARM7 (Umarim) is to step back for new designs, moreover
>> > when the new CortexM4 is currently available.
>> >
>> > Maybe I missing something, and I would like to know what are the
>> > reasons of prefeering Umarim over Lisa/L.
>> > Thanks in advance.
>> >
>> > Héctor.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Gareth Roberts
>> > <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >         Hi all,
>> >
>> >         Nice to see the interest.  I'm currently waiting on getting a
>> >         quote back
>> >         from the manufacturer; when I do I'll have some prices.
>> >         I'm in discussions with our accounts department regarding
>> >         other people
>> >         purchasing boards from us.
>> >
>> >         Cheers,
>> >         Gareth
>> >
>> >
>> >         On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 20:18 +0000, Gareth Roberts wrote:
>> >         > Hi all,
>> >         >
>> >         > I'm planning on getting some Umarim boards made up for a
>> >         project we are working on.
>> >         > Obviously the bigger the volume the cheaper it's going to
>> >         be.
>> >         >
>> >         > Any UK dwellers interested?
>> >         >
>> >         > Cheers,
>> >         > Gareth
>> >         > _______________________________________________
>> >         > Paparazzi-devel mailing list
>> >         > address@hidden
>> >         > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >         _______________________________________________
>> >         Paparazzi-devel mailing list
>> >         address@hidden
>> >         https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Héctor
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Paparazzi-devel mailing list
>> > address@hidden
>> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
> ________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
>