Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Problems getting an overview of Paparazzi

[Christian Merfels]

> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:46, Christian Merfels
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Well, if that is how it's done, than one would normally need to use the
>> transmitters, the board and everything else supported by Paparazzi (as
>> suggested by you). But as our task is not to just assemble an UAV - we
>> need to do some engineering work - the only possibility would be to
>> build an own Tiny2 board. Is this correct??
> 
> Or you could run Paparazzi as a Linux-Userland process and
> write the code to support your specific sensors, actors and communication.
> 
> Marcus

By doing this, we still would have to get a Tiny2 board, which seems to
be our biggest problem. Trading off between and buying new components
and writing Linux driver code, we are probably better off with the new
components (given time as a factor) ...