paparazzi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Paparazzi-devel] ArduIMU on Wiki


From: Stephen L Hulme
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] ArduIMU on Wiki
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 19:32:42 +1300

Hi Martin
 
Thank you very much for the info. 
 
Since I never wanted my two original funjets to fly fast (cannot fly well enough for that) I will stay with a swapped out AXI 2212/26 + 9x6 prop combo for the Ultra in the first instance.
 
I was only interested as I noticed you moved up from a Jeti 25 Amp ESC in your old funjets to the 33 Spin in the Ultra. 
 
It made me wonder whether the old power set was struggling in the new plane. 
 
Regards
 
Stephen   
 
On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 08:04:52 +0100, Martin Mueller wrote:
 
Hi Stephen,

you can fly the AXI 2212/26 in the Funjet Ultra (we have flown a Funjet with more than 900g with that engine - no fun to land, though). But the Ultra is designed to fly fast, so better get a bigger motor with more RPMs and a smaller prop. The 9x6 gives thrust but not speed.

Martin

On 02.11.2010 23:59, Stephen L Hulme wrote:
Hi Martin



I too have an ArduIMU unit which I will install in a Funjet Ultra. when they 
become available at Tower Hobbies (soon apparently)



I know this is slightly unrelated to this thread, but I noted your funjetmm2 
runs the Ultra airframe.



Did you have to upgrade the motor set from an AXI 2212/26 with a 9x6 prop to 
compensate for the heavier airframe compared to the original funjet?



Regards



Stephen





On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:16:04 +0100, Martin Mueller wrote:



Hi David,


with the Arduino debug plug pointing forward in flight and parts up the directions work ok for me. Maybe it is the earth horizon moving the other way than the aircraft?

Martin


On 02.11.2010 05:07, David Conger wrote:

    Hi Martin,


With your help I have a Tiny2.11 with an ArduIMU connected to the I2C port. I followed the Wiki and am using your airframe suggested with the exception that I also commented the ADC IR values and set the modem to transparent.


Holding the IMU with the arrows on the IMU for X,Y,Z I see pitch in the PFD is shown correctly. However the roll is reversed. If this was an airframe with IR I would change the sign for: LATERAL_CORRECTION in the INFRARED section. As expected there is no INFRARED section. I sure could use a LATERAL_CORRECTION value to modify though :)


Is there a way I do not see to reverse the roll? Before doing this I did upload the firmware in SVN for the arduIMU (as per the Wiki).


BTW, very cool to see IMU data and the PFD artificial horizon responding to the IMU movements. Thank you for all your help so far. I think I am close.


-David On Oct 30, 2010, at 11:26 PM, Martin Mueller wrote:


Hi David,


Thanks to the new notes I have a compiled airframe I would like to try the ArduIMU and followed the steps from the Wiki. However there was no mention of this value: <subsystem name="attitude" type="infrared"/> ...and the IR_ values farther in.. Can someone help. If I do not have IR and am flying with ArduIMU what becomes of those values? Removing them all brings compile errors. Leaving them without any IR sensors won't cause issues? Would it be possible for someone who is flying with IMU to post their airframe to SVN or in a reply? vn100 or ArduIMU or even Booz IMU.


you might try airframes/mm/fixed-wing/fw_ins_arduimu.xml. The infrared must be removed at the moment not to have two software parts update the estimator. Did you use settings/tuning_ins.xml as mentioned in (4)?


Martin


_______________________________________________ Paparazzi-devel mailing list address@hidden http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel



    _______________________________________________
    Paparazzi-devel mailing list
    address@hidden
    http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel





_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]