paparazzi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Doubt Regarding IR


From: Arun Sajeevan
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Doubt Regarding IR
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:24:41 +0530

Hi,
Thankyou so much for the reply. The air of confusion is cleared now.
Regards
Arun

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Reto Büttner <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi Tilman and Arun,

I agree with Tilman concerning responsitivity.

Voltage vs angle would also be similar a trigonometric function. The
responsitivity is similar a cosine, the voltage would be similar to a
sine.

Cheers, Reto

2010/8/27 Tilman Baumann <address@hidden>:
> Tilman Baumann wrote:
>
>> If you would plot voltage vs angle you would probably get hysteresis like
>> courve. Not sure about that, but that seems to make sense to me.
>>
>> Not sure if I'm BSing here. But this is how it made sense to me.
>
> Hysteresis is obviously the wrong term as I just realised.
>
> Well, I'm not a matematician. I mean a courve that follows the form or a
> typical hysteresis but obviously without the actual hysteresis effect (not
> following the same courve for both directions).
>
> Sorry for that. If somebody here knows what cource I'm babbling about, I
> would be interested in the actual name of that thing. :)
>
>  Tilman
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>

_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]