[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[paparazzi-commits] [paparazzi/paparazzi] 07317f: [modules] edgeflow noi
From: |
GitHub |
Subject: |
[paparazzi-commits] [paparazzi/paparazzi] 07317f: [modules] edgeflow noisemeasurement fix (#1820) |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Jul 2016 02:15:21 -0700 |
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/paparazzi/paparazzi
Commit: 07317f1be26e0c70264a217a7a082fd4e9bb81b9
https://github.com/paparazzi/paparazzi/commit/07317f1be26e0c70264a217a7a082fd4e9bb81b9
Author: knmcguire <address@hidden>
Date: 2016-07-22 (Fri, 22 Jul 2016)
Changed paths:
M conf/airframes/TUDELFT/tudelft_bebop_opticflow.xml
M conf/modules/cv_opticflow.xml
M sw/airborne/modules/computer_vision/opticflow/opticflow_calculator.c
M sw/airborne/modules/computer_vision/opticflow/opticflow_calculator.h
M sw/airborne/modules/computer_vision/opticflow_module.c
Log Message:
-----------
[modules] edgeflow noisemeasurement fix (#1820)
The more corners the algorithm tracked, the higher the noise measurement (est
velocity error = tracked corners/ max_corners) becomes. However this is not
wanted for the ins_hff, since there a higher estimated velocity error results
in less trust in that measurementof the Kalman filter. I made a new equation,
which actually gives a lower noise measurement with more corners.
In the future there needs to be a better, with optitrack groundtruth backed up,
noise model, however this pull request will hopefully give an intermediate
solution. I also added an optional median filter if the hff is not used or if
more outliers needed to be filtered out.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [paparazzi-commits] [paparazzi/paparazzi] 07317f: [modules] edgeflow noisemeasurement fix (#1820),
GitHub <=