|
From: | Piotr Stanczyk |
Subject: | Re: [Openexr-devel] Thread safety |
Date: | Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:06:32 +0000 |
I was just having the same conversation yesterday...
I think I would like to see an abstraction where you can sub in your own implementation with a fallback to the current one. Anyone have strong thoughts / opinions on this? Is this something that people would like to be able to configure at build time or runrtime? From: openexr-devel-bounces+address@hidden [openexr-devel-bounces+address@hidden on behalf of Christopher Horvath address@hidden
Sent: 03 April 2013 08:44 To: Peter Hillman Cc: address@hidden Subject: Re: [Openexr-devel] Thread safety Is there any hope for IlmThread being retired in favor of OpenMP, TBB, or the C++ 11 std threads library?
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Peter Hillman
<address@hidden> wrote:
I think this situation absolutely requires that a really futile and stupid gesture be done on somebody's part. And we're just the guys to do it. |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |