Re: [Om-synth] is om in CVS broken?

[Dave Robillard]

On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 01:30 +0100, federico wrote:
> Dave Robillard ha scritto:
> >On Sun, 2005-06-11 at 16:09 +0100, federico wrote:
> >
> >>I get this error building om from CVS:
> >>BridgeNode.cpp: In member function `void Om::BridgeNode<T>::activate()':
> >>BridgeNode.cpp:63: error: syntax error before `>' token
> >>BridgeNode.cpp:57: confused by earlier errors, bailing out
> >>make[4]: *** [BridgeNode.o] Error 1
> >>    
> >I did a bit of refactoring and cleaning up the other day.  Shouldn't be
> >a problem, builds fine for me.  What gcc version are you using?
> >
> >The error is related to C++ templates, maybe older g++'s choke on it.
> >
> i use gcc 3.3.6. what compiler you used?

4.0.  Can anyone report on building current CVS with 3.3?

Note (IMPORTANT) that you can NOT mix code compiled with g++ 3.3 and g++
3.4+ (including 4.0) whatsoever, at all, ever.  This means if your
system libraries are built with g++ 3.3, you can not build Om with g++
3.4 or 4.0.

This is only actually an issue with om_gtk though, since om doesn't
depend on any C++ libraries.

-DR-