[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Office-commits] r10045 - trunk/campaigns/pipeline
From: |
sysadmin |
Subject: |
[Office-commits] r10045 - trunk/campaigns/pipeline |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:40:24 -0400 |
Author: www-data
Date: Wed Oct 7 14:40:24 2009
New Revision: 10045
Log:
web commit by holmes
Modified:
trunk/campaigns/pipeline/acawikiblogpost.mdwn
Modified: trunk/campaigns/pipeline/acawikiblogpost.mdwn
==============================================================================
--- trunk/campaigns/pipeline/acawikiblogpost.mdwn Wed Oct 7 14:39:20
2009 (r10044)
+++ trunk/campaigns/pipeline/acawikiblogpost.mdwn Wed Oct 7 14:40:24
2009 (r10045)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Even though sharing knowledge is one of the most basic principles of science,
and even though much scientific research is funded by public institutions or
universities, the vast majority of scientific papers end up in inaccessible
troves controlled by private journals. [AcaWiki](http://acawiki.org) is a
brand new project to change that.
-From their announcement: "Currently, it can cost up to $35 to download an
academic paper—a significant cost, especially because thorough research on any
topic usually entails downloading many papers. AcaWiki’s approach takes
advantage of the fact that copyright does not apply to ideas, only to the
written expression of those ideas. Scholars can thus post summaries of their or
others’ research online as long as they are not copying verbatim beyond what
fair-use laws permit."
+From their [announcement](http://acawiki.org/AcaWiki:PressRelease-2009-10-07):
"Currently, it can cost up to $35 to download an academic paper—a significant
cost, especially because thorough research on any topic usually entails
downloading many papers. AcaWiki’s approach takes advantage of the fact that
copyright does not apply to ideas, only to the written expression of those
ideas. Scholars can thus post summaries of their or others’ research online as
long as they are not copying verbatim beyond what fair-use laws permit."
In other words, who needs an expensive journal subscription when you can get
long, meticulously detailed summaries for free? Summaries can be written by
any community member with access to the original article, or by the original
team of researchers themselves. Even if academics face strong incentives or
requirements to publish in private journals, nothing in copyright law prohibits
them from republishing a summary elsewhere.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Office-commits] r10045 - trunk/campaigns/pipeline,
sysadmin <=