[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: clang static analysis
|
From: |
Markus Mützel |
|
Subject: |
Re: clang static analysis |
|
Date: |
Sat, 3 Oct 2020 00:28:11 +0200 |
Am 02. Oktober 2020 um 22:10 Uhr schrieb "Dmitri A. Sergatskov":
> I ran a clang-11 static analysis on 2219027f5bd4 (stable).
> Results are available at:
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/13Qz6svSS4yEwffpNFkd7X-_wQN7ykLky/view?usp=sharing
The report indicates that constructs like the following are potential memory
leaks:
double lo = (lims.get ().matrix_value ())(0);
Is that true? Do the intermediate results need a scoped variable?
It might be a false alarm. I don't know how such constructs are reference
counted.
Markus