[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: uploading and tagging version 5.2.0?
From: |
Kai Torben Ohlhus |
Subject: |
Re: uploading and tagging version 5.2.0? |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jan 2020 07:41:31 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 |
On 1/28/20 3:26 AM, Mike Miller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It looks like the stable branch has been updated to version 5.2.0 on
> Friday (https://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/f4b6b170a761).
>
> This change typically means the release is done, so is someone planning
> on tagging and uploading the release to ftp?
>
> Since the stable branch has advanced, please remember to rewind to
> revision f4b6b170a761 when running 'make dist'.
>
> Thanks,
>
Yes, I did this change before to avoid Octave's typical: "We have
released but forgotten to update the date/version number in document X"
https://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/c2e6725987ce
which is for example now part of our official Octave 5.1.0 tarball and
happened quite often in the pas in the heat of the release.
Personally I think we can tag any commit as 5.2.0. There a always small
things one easily forgets. For me a commit like
https://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/5d9316571d91
is totally enough to identify a release.
Right now, I did not build the final releases to wait for urgent small
last minute commits. I want to start the builds on Friday so we can
enjoy with beginning of February Octave 5.2.0.
Kai