[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: auto and const_iterators
From: |
Rik |
Subject: |
Re: auto and const_iterators |
Date: |
Wed, 2 May 2018 15:06:27 -0700 |
On 05/02/2018 02:52 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:
>
> Either solution is OK with me, but I see more lines that remove
> const_iterator than iterator. Are the only ones we have to change the
> ones where the object itself is not const but we were accessing elements
> with a const_iterator?
That's right. It's only when we want to confirm to the compiler that the
access should be read-only which is only necessary for a mutable object.
If the entire object is const already then all accesses are necessarily
read-only.
--Rik