[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?
From: |
Tatsuro MATSUOKA |
Subject: |
Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ? |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:13:50 +0900 (JST) |
----- Original Message -----
> From: Tatsuro MATSUOKA >
> To: Julien Bect ; "octave-maintainers
> Cc:
> Date: 2017/3/17, Fri 08:35
> Subject: Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Julien Bect
>> To: address@hidden
>> Date: 2017/3/17, Fri 06:06
>> Subject: Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?
>>
>>
>> Le 16/03/2017 à 09:11, Tatsuro MATSUOKA a écrit :
>>
>> I have executed __run_test_suite__ but hangs.
> libinterp\corefcn\lsode.cc-tst .............................. LSODE--
> AT T (=R1) AND STEP SIZE H (=R2), THE
> CORRECTOR CONVERGENCE FAILED REPEATEDLY
> OR WITH ABS(H) = HMIN
> In above, R1 = 0.0000000000000D+00 R2 = 0.3802108489572D-09
> LSODE-- AT T (=R1) AND STEP SIZE H (=R2), THE
> CORRECTOR CONVERGENCE FAILED REPEATEDLY
> OR WITH ABS(H) = HMIN
> In above, R1 = 0.0000000000000D+00 R2 = 0.6424715644617D-09
> LSODE-- AT T (=R1) AND STEP SIZE H (=R2), THE
> CORRECTOR CONVERGENCE FAILED REPEATEDLY
> OR WITH ABS(H) = HMIN
> In above, R1 = 0.0000000000000D+00 R2 = 0.4165001171641D-09
> PASS 2/5
> FAIL 3
> libinterp\corefcn\lu.cc-tst .................................panic:
> Segmentation fault -- stopping myself... Mmmmmmmm. Anyway I will test again
> against binary I am now re-building after clean up.
>>
>> Hi Tatsuro,
>>
>> I haven't tried myself, but my colleague confirmed the crash with
> lsode.
>>
>> There were also some failed tests with det and eig (see below).
> Have you already seen these ?
>>
>> @++
>> Julien
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> ***** assert (det ([1, 2; 3, 4]), -2, 10*eps)
>> !!!!! test failed
>> ASSERT errors for: assert (det ([1, 2; 3, 4]),-2,10 * eps)
>>
>> Location | Observed | Expected | Reason
>> () 2 -2 Abs err 4 exceeds tol 2.2204e-015
>>
>> ***** assert (det (single ([1, 2; 3, 4])), single (-2), 10*eps
> ("single"))
>> !!!!! test failed
>> ASSERT errors for: assert (det (single ([1, 2; 3, 4])),single (-2),10 * eps
> ("single"))
>>
>> Location | Observed | Expected | Reason
>> () 2 -2 Abs err 4 exceeds tol 1.1921e-006
>>
>> ***** test
>> A = diag([10^-16, 10^-15]);
>> chol_qz_accuracy (A, A, true, false);
>> !!!!! test failed
>> ASSERT errors for: assert (isequal (A * V2, A * V2 * D2),is_chol_accurate)
>>
>> Location | Observed | Expected | Reason
>> () 1 0 Abs err 1 exceeds tol 0
>>
>>
>
>
> I have built again octave-4.2.1 with LargeArray after clean up but results
> are
> the same.
>
>> I haven't tried myself, but my colleague confirmed the crash with
> lsode.
>
>
> crash happens on lu but not onlsode
>
> libinterp\corefcn\lu.cc-tst .................................panic:
> Segmentation fault -- stopping myself...
>
>
> on lsode error happens.
>
> Hang on lu is easy to reproduce.
>
>>> A=rand(5);
>>> [L,U,P]=lu(A);
>
> panic: Segmentation fault -- stopping myself...
> attempting to save variables to 'octave-workspace'...
> save to 'octave-workspace' complete
>
>> There were also some failed tests with det and eig (see below).
> Have you already seen these ?
>
>
> I have also seen this.
>
> On octave-4.0.3 for windows with Large Arrays, I have not seen such errors on
> __run_test_suite__.
>
> Unfortunately octave-4.2.x for windows with Large Arrays has many fault, it
> cannot be usable.
>
> octave-4.0.3 for windows with Large Arrays can be downloaded from
> http://www.tatsuromatsuoka.com/octave/Eng/Win/
>
Perhaps my build failed without --enable-fortran-int64.
(That option was not required for mxe-build before I think )
I am trying rebuild 4.2.1 adding this option.
Tatsuro
- Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?, (continued)
- Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?, PhilipNienhuis, 2017/03/15
- Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?, Julien Bect, 2017/03/15
- Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?, PhilipNienhuis, 2017/03/15
- Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2017/03/15
- Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?, Julien Bect, 2017/03/16
- Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2017/03/16
- Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2017/03/16
- Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2017/03/16
- Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?, Julien Bect, 2017/03/16
- Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2017/03/16
- Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?,
Tatsuro MATSUOKA <=
- Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?, John W. Eaton, 2017/03/17
- Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2017/03/20
Re: Octave on Windows with large arrays ?, address@hidden, 2017/03/17