Re: package maintainers please choose a package group

[Juan Pablo Carbajal]

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Carlo De Falco
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> On 13 Mar 2017, at 18:23, Olaf Till <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Dear package maintainers,
>>
>> please choose one of the two groups:
>>
>> https://octave.sourceforge.io/dev-descr-two-groups.php
>>
>> for your packages. The group will be indicated at the packages page
>> for each package.
>>
>> With the information we have so far, the packages listed below have
>> been preliminarily assigned to the "community" group.
>>
>> Olaf
>>
>> suggested community packages:
>>
>> bim
>> cgi
>> communications
>> control
>> data-smoothing
>> database
>> dataframe
>> dicom
>> econometrics
>> fem-fenics
>> financial
>> fpl
>> fuzzy-logic-toolkit
>> ga
>> general
>> generate_html
>> geometry
>> gsl
>> image
>> image-acquisition
>> instrument-control
>> interval
>> io
>> level-set
>> linear-algebra
>> lssa
>> mapping
>> miscellaneous
>> mpi
>> msh
>> mvn
>> nurbs
>> ocs
>> optics
>> optim
>> parallel
>> quaternion
>> queueing
>> secs1d
>> secs2d
>> secs3d
>> signal
>> sockets
>> splines
>> statistics
>> strings
>> struct
>> vibes
>> video
>> vrml
>> windows
>> zeromq
>>
>> --
>> public key id EAFE0591, e.g. on x-hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The recipient list of this email is incomplete, apart from myself, at least 
> the maintainer of fem-fenics is missing
> (but that's just the first one I noticed, there may be others).
>
> Not all package maintainers regularly check posts from the mailing list so I 
> would recomend forwarding the message to them directly.
>
> c.
>
>
>
>
Hi Olaf,
I was assuming that you wanted to hear only negative answers (the case
that needs work). But if you also want ot check who is getting the
mails, then:

It is ok to leave geometry as a community package.