|
From: | Brad Bell |
Subject: | Re: Algorithmic Differentiation in Octave |
Date: | Wed, 25 Jan 2017 05:32:07 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 |
That does sound very awkard. Looking on the GNU page about this, on /licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#AGPLProxyThe AGPL says you must make the offer to "all users". If you know that a certain user has already been shown the offer, for the current version of the software, you don't have to repeat it to that user again.
This does seem awkward. I will switch the license to GPL3. On 01/24/2017 11:58 PM, Olaf Till wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 01:59:15PM -0700, Brad Bell wrote:Is some other license preferred by Octave ?I'm just not familiar enough with the AGPL3 to know its implications if the code gets _indirectly_ (via different modules) remotely accessible. If we'd have to print messages containing the source code location at each usage, this would be awkward. In this case, the plain GPL3 would probably be preferrable. Olaf
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |