[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s
From: |
Sebastian Schöps |
Subject: |
Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Mar 2016 11:52:22 -0800 (PST) |
Richard Crozier wrote
> The closest equivalent solver in odepkg is probably
> ode5r and, at least for the problems I solve this is much slower because
> the number of steps taken to solve the problem is far smaller with ode15s.
Is your right-hand-side smoot enough? If yes, both ode15s and ode5r should
have similar performance, both are accurate up to 5th order. however single
step methods tend to use more function evaluations. if this is the
bottleneck, then you might go better with odebdi (nonetheless we should get
an ode15s for octave...)
Seb.
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/GSoC-2016-project-idea-implementation-of-ode15s-tp4675229p4675234.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s, Richard Crozier, 2016/03/05
- Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s,
Sebastian Schöps <=
- Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s, Nir Krakauer, 2016/03/05
- Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s, Sebastian Schöps, 2016/03/05
- Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s, Richard Crozier, 2016/03/06
- Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s, Sebastian, 2016/03/06
- Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s, Richard Crozier, 2016/03/07
- Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s, Carlo De Falco, 2016/03/07
- Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s, Richard Crozier, 2016/03/07
- Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s, Carlo De Falco, 2016/03/07
- Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s, Carlo De Falco, 2016/03/07