octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: F77 vs. F90 in Octave


From: Daniel J Sebald
Subject: Re: F77 vs. F90 in Octave
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 15:36:13 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16

On 11/24/2014 03:06 PM, Mike Miller wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 15:02:16 -0600, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
That's correct.  But I just found out how to view what AC's preferred list
is.  gfortran is now at the front of the list.  The fact that g77 isn't even
in their list, I think means that we don't even have to worry about any
problem that the stream-editor epilogue script was attempting to solve.
That is, the comment

   ## FIXME -- we should really work to fix autoconf so that it prefers
   ## gfortran over g77 even when searching for a Fortran 77 compiler.

has been implemented apparently.

I do not believe that is correct. The list you are looking at has
already been run through the bootstrap_epilogue function.

Do feel free to try deleting that function and run ./bootstrap again
and prove me wrong :)

Ah, good point. I just noticed two "gfortran"s in the list, so something is funny. Let me try...

Yes, so g77 comes up first. I take it from the epilogue comment that the issue isn't compile errors, but the compiled code will malfunction. So "fixing compile errors" isn't a good strategy in that case.

Now that I understand the autotools a little more, I don't see the epilogue as much of an issue. Someone can always set F77 environment variable to g77 if that is wanted.

So where were we? If we simply remove FC=$F77, then worry about compile errors?

Dan



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]