|
From: | Daniel J Sebald |
Subject: | Re: F77 vs. F90 in Octave |
Date: | Mon, 24 Nov 2014 15:36:13 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 |
On 11/24/2014 03:06 PM, Mike Miller wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 15:02:16 -0600, Daniel J Sebald wrote:That's correct. But I just found out how to view what AC's preferred list is. gfortran is now at the front of the list. The fact that g77 isn't even in their list, I think means that we don't even have to worry about any problem that the stream-editor epilogue script was attempting to solve. That is, the comment ## FIXME -- we should really work to fix autoconf so that it prefers ## gfortran over g77 even when searching for a Fortran 77 compiler. has been implemented apparently.I do not believe that is correct. The list you are looking at has already been run through the bootstrap_epilogue function. Do feel free to try deleting that function and run ./bootstrap again and prove me wrong :)
Ah, good point. I just noticed two "gfortran"s in the list, so something is funny. Let me try...
Yes, so g77 comes up first. I take it from the epilogue comment that the issue isn't compile errors, but the compiled code will malfunction. So "fixing compile errors" isn't a good strategy in that case.
Now that I understand the autotools a little more, I don't see the epilogue as much of an issue. Someone can always set F77 environment variable to g77 if that is wanted.
So where were we? If we simply remove FC=$F77, then worry about compile errors?
Dan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |