[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions
|
From: |
PrasannaKumar Muralidharan |
|
Subject: |
Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions |
|
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 10:53:33 +0530 |
A relative comparison (without worrying about the CPU frequency,
instruction set, RAM etc) can help. Run the benchmark before and after
applying a patch, note the results. The results can be compared to
analyse the impact of the patch. This way the machine details can be
eleminated. Just my thoughts.
PrasannaKumar
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, (continued)
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Carnë Draug, 2014/06/23
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Mike Miller, 2014/06/23
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Michael D. Godfrey, 2014/06/23
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Daniel J Sebald, 2014/06/23
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Michael D. Godfrey, 2014/06/23
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Julien Bect, 2014/06/24
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Daniel J Sebald, 2014/06/24
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Daniel J Sebald, 2014/06/24
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Daniel J Sebald, 2014/06/24
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions,
PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <=
RE: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Justin, 2014/06/18