|
From: | Daniel J Sebald |
Subject: | Re: Mercurial tools |
Date: | Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:01:35 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 |
On 01/27/2014 12:54 PM, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso wrote:
On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 10:34 -0600, Daniel J Sebald wrote:The merging topic brings to mind TortoiseHG.I heartily endorse thg to anyone who wants an hg GUI. It's well maintained, cross-platform, and closely follows main hg development. I use it infrequently for some things like inspecting the DAG.
It also closely follows the syntax and workflow of Mercurial, not trying to present some other type of scheme to the user. I've discovered a few features of Mercurial by trying various icons on the Tortoise display.
I do want to say one thing, though...2) Ability to selectively leave code hunks out of changeset.The record and crecord extensions can also achieve the same effect in a CLI or curses interface. The record extension is shipped with hg, but crecord is in an external repo. I use them both frequently for picking apart commits.
I wasn't aware of crecord: https://bitbucket.org/edgimar/crecord/wiki/Home but it's basically the same thing. Dan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |