[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Aw: Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m
From: |
Stefan Mahr |
Subject: |
Aw: Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:30:49 +0200 (CEST) |
> > >>> oops! The test only fails for me the 1st time it is run, and only
> > >>> because the axes handles are in the wrong order.
> > >>>
> > >>> Ben
> > >>
> > >> It's weird. With your test script I get the same results as you.
> > >> However, the resulting output still has different y-axis size for both
> > >> plots.
> > >>
> > >> If I copy-paste your example block-wise in interactive mode, I get more
> > >> errors. Could it be some kind of timing problem?
> > >
> > > The extra errors are because the test aborts after the first error.
> > >
> > >> -----------
> > >>
> > >> graphics_toolkit fltk
> > >> close all
> > >> hf = figure (gcf (), "__graphics_toolkit__", "fltk", "visible", "on");
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> subplot(2,1,1); plot(rand(10,1)); subplot(2,1,2); plot(rand(10,1))
> > >> hax = findall (gcf (), "type", "axes");
> > >> positions = cell2mat (get (hax, "position"));
> > >> outerpositions = cell2mat (get (hax, "outerposition"));
> > >> looseinsets = cell2mat (get (hax, "looseinset"));
> > >> tightinsets = cell2mat (get (hax, "tightinset"));
> > >> close all
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> subplot(2,1,1); plot(rand(10,1)); subplot(2,1,2); plot(rand(10,1))
> > >> hax = findall (gcf (), "type", "axes");
> > >> assert (cell2mat (get (hax, "position")), positions, 0.001)
> > >> assert (cell2mat (get (hax, "outerposition")), outerpositions, 0.001)
> > >> assert (cell2mat (get (hax, "looseinset")), looseinsets, 0.001)
> > >> assert (cell2mat (get (hax, "tightinset")), tightinsets, 0.001)
> > >>
> > >> ------------------------
> > >>
> > >>> assert (cell2mat (get (hax, "position")), positions, 0.001)
> > >> error: assert (cell2mat (get (hax, "position")),positions,0.001) expected
> > >> 0.13000 0.58384 0.77500 0.32733
> > >> 0.13000 0.12384 0.77500 0.32733
> > >> but got
> > >> 0.13000 0.60122 0.77500 0.30994
> > >> 0.13000 0.18964 0.77500 0.26152
> > >> maximum absolute error 0.0658047 exceeds tolerance 0.001
> > >> error: called from:
> > >> error: /usr/share/octave/3.7.5/m/testfun/assert.m at line 235, column 5
> > >>> assert (cell2mat (get (hax, "outerposition")), outerpositions, 0.001)
> > >>> assert (cell2mat (get (hax, "looseinset")), looseinsets, 0.001)
> > >>> assert (cell2mat (get (hax, "tightinset")), tightinsets, 0.001)
> > >> error: assert (cell2mat (get (hax, "tightinset")),tightinsets,0.001)
> > >> expected
> > >> 0.042857 0.013122 0.000000 0.026316
> > >> 0.042857 0.013199 0.000000 0.026316
> > >> but got
> > >> 0.04286 0.09122 0.00000 0.01696
> > >> 0.04286 0.13964 0.00000 0.00000
> > >> maximum absolute error 0.126443 exceeds tolerance 0.001
> > >> error: called from:
> > >> error: /usr/share/octave/3.7.5/m/testfun/assert.m at line 235, column 5
> > >
> > > The second error is the one I hoped to catch. I'll work in fixing the
> > > test.
> > >
> > > Ben
> >
> > Does the attached version isolate the second error?
> >
> > Ben
>
> It's not related to the test itself, but line
> hf = figure (gcf (), "__graphics_toolkit__", "fltk", "visible", "on");
> fails for me. I need to add 'graphics_toolkit fltk' in the first line to make
> it work.
>
>
> If the test in run in script mode, it always pass. While testing Rik's plot
> issue I realized, that subplot is not neccessary for catching the y-axis bug.
> The optical difference is not as big as with subplot, so I overlooked it in
> the past. With attached patch the bug is reproducable in script mode. Please
> note the 'sleep(2)' after the plot command. Without this sleep, the test pass
> without error.
>
>
> Stefan
>
> PS: Over night I updated from fltk 1.1 to 1.3. It doesn't affect the bug.
>
Just forgot to add the error message for reference:
!!!!! test failed
assert (get (hax, "position"),positions,0.001) expected
0.13000 0.14106 0.77500 0.78394
but got
0.13000 0.11000 0.77500 0.81500
maximum absolute error 0.0310642 exceeds tolerance 0.001
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, (continued)
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Ben Abbott, 2013/07/20
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Stefan Mahr, 2013/07/21
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Ben Abbott, 2013/07/21
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Ben Abbott, 2013/07/21
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Stefan Mahr, 2013/07/21
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Stefan Mahr, 2013/07/21
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Ben Abbott, 2013/07/21
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Ben Abbott, 2013/07/21
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Ben Abbott, 2013/07/21
- Aw: Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Stefan Mahr, 2013/07/22
- Aw: Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m,
Stefan Mahr <=
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Ben Abbott, 2013/07/22
- Aw: Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Stefan Mahr, 2013/07/22
- Re: Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2013/07/22
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, John W. Eaton, 2013/07/22
- Re: __plt_get_axis_arg__, Rik, 2013/07/22
- Re: __plt_get_axis_arg__, Michael D. Godfrey, 2013/07/22
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Ben Abbott, 2013/07/25
- Aw: Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Stefan Mahr, 2013/07/25
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Ben Abbott, 2013/07/25
- Aw: Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Stefan Mahr, 2013/07/25