[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m
From: |
bpabbott |
Subject: |
Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:28:37 -0700 (PDT) |
I composed a simple test script to compare Matlab and Octave
clf ()
subplot (3,1,1)
plot (rand (3))
title ({'one', 'two', 'three'})
xlabel xlabel
subplot (3,1,2)
plot (rand (3))
xlabel xlabel
subplot (3,1,3)
xlabel xlabel
plot (rand (3))
xlabel xlabel
The results for Octave and Matlab are at the links below.
<http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/file/n4655822/FLTK.png>
<http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/file/n4655822/Matlab.png>
The results are consistent, but are also more esthetic than your example.
Can you provide a short script which I can run through Matlab to see how it
behaves?
In any event, I do think the margins between the subplots are too generous
and can be reduced.
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/changes-to-graphics-cc-and-subplot-m-tp4655812p4655822.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Ben Abbott, 2013/07/18
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, PhilipNienhuis, 2013/07/19
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m,
bpabbott <=
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Ben Abbott, 2013/07/19
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, PhilipNienhuis, 2013/07/19
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, bpabbott, 2013/07/19
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, PhilipNienhuis, 2013/07/19
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Michael D. Godfrey, 2013/07/19
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Ben Abbott, 2013/07/19
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, PhilipNienhuis, 2013/07/19
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Ben Abbott, 2013/07/19
Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Stefan Mahr, 2013/07/20