|
From: | Ed Meyer |
Subject: | Re: Welcome C++11! |
Date: | Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:26:08 -0800 |
Both not stripped. Do you think the contrast will be lower if we strip them?Júlio.2012/12/13 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <address@hidden>
Are both stripped? What's are the sizes pre-stripping?On 13 December 2012 11:55, Júlio Hoffimann <address@hidden> wrote:
> Jordi,
>
> Failures mostly related to NaN, Inf extreme cases. It's strange, i'll
> investigate if something changed in the standard, i doubt.
>
> Marco,
>
> C++98
> total 390M
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1.2K 2012-12-12 12:55 liboctave.la*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 158M 2012-12-12 12:55 liboctave.so.1.0.1*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1.4K 2012-12-12 12:56 liboctgui.la*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 17M 2012-12-12 12:56 liboctgui.so.0.0.0*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1.3K 2012-12-12 12:56 liboctinterp.la*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 217M 2012-12-12 12:56 liboctinterp.so.1.0.1*
>
> C++11
> total 44M
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1.2K 2012-12-13 13:42 liboctave.la*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 19M 2012-12-13 13:42 liboctave.so.1.0.1*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1.4K 2012-12-13 13:43 liboctgui.la*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1.7M 2012-12-13 13:43 liboctgui.so.0.0.0*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1.3K 2012-12-13 13:42 liboctinterp.la*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 23M 2012-12-13 13:42 liboctinterp.so.1.0.1*
>
> Huge differences, almost 9x reduction. Isn't that cool?!
- Jordi G. H.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |