Re: bootstrap vs. autogen.sh

[krthie]

John W. Eaton wrote
> OK, I have no problem with renaming autogen.sh to bootstrap.

I so happened to "hg update" today and noticed this, while

http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/interpreter/Building-the-Development-Sources.html

still mentions autogen.sh. Of course, this change is brand new, but I
thought I'd mention it such that this doesn't get forgotten.

By the way, should the mercurial repo contain a file telling the developer
to use ./bootstrap etc?

thanks

Kris




--
View this message in context: 
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/bootstrap-vs-autogen-sh-tp4644116p4644438.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.