[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: .h.in vs .in.h
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: .h.in vs .in.h |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:24:13 -0400 |
On 11-Apr-2012, Júlio Hoffimann wrote:
| Well, if i understood correctly, why not just do a trivial `grep ... *.h
*.h.in
I often forget that there are .in files.
| ' ? If targeting only Bash (what i think is not the case), you can be even
| more compact: grep *.{h,h.in}
I also often do things like
find . -name '*.h' -o -name '*.cc' | xargs grep ...
to find files in the entire directory tree.
| It's strange having *.in.h files.
How is it any stranger than having .h.in files?
jwe
- .h.in vs .in.h, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Júlio Hoffimann, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Michael Goffioul, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Júlio Hoffimann, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Júlio Hoffimann, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/04/11