[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: isnan in fortran
From: |
c. |
Subject: |
Re: isnan in fortran |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:52:17 +0200 |
On 11 Apr 2012, at 18:43, Mike Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:19 PM, c. <address@hidden> wrote:
>> what about the attached changeset?
>
> Looks good to me, just read through it quickly for now. For my part,
> I won't be able to test it until later, but when I do I will test
> against at least g77 3.4.6 and gfortran 4.1.2. And now for some
> comments.
>
> Related to another thread started by jwe today, the new file names
> should be *.in.f instead of *.f.in.
>
> I would add "implicit none" to the configure check test program and
> define "real x", just to be extra pedantic and make sure the compiler
> doesn't quietly accept "isnan" as an undefined external symbol.
>
> --
> mike
OK, here is an updated version of the changeset.
c.
open_t2HFlbzu.txt
Description: Text document
- Re: isnan in fortran, (continued)
- Re: isnan in fortran, c., 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, Mike Miller, 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, c., 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, c., 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, Mike Miller, 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran,
c. <=
- Re: isnan in fortran, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, c., 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, c., 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, Mike Miller, 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, Mike Miller, 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11