|
From: | Ben Abbott |
Subject: | Re: Implementation for missing function tetramesh |
Date: | Sun, 01 Apr 2012 21:20:50 -0400 |
On Apr 1, 2012, at 9:48 AM, Martin Helm wrote: > Am 31.03.2012 16:36, schrieb Ben Abbott: > >> On Mar 31, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Martin Helm wrote: >> >>> Am 31.03.2012 02:45, schrieb Martin Helm: >>> >>>> Attached is a first version for the function tetramesh. I tried to make >>>> it as matlab compatible as possible. Since I have myself no access to ML >>>> probably someone who has can give me some feedback for improvements >>>> before I create a proper patch. >>>> It works with both gnuplot and fltk backend but due to the limitations >>>> of the 3d patches in gnuplot it works best with fltk. >>> Removed some typos in the help text and split the demo into several demo >>> blocks. >>> <tetramesh.m> >> >> I'll look it over today. >> >> There are some things that can be done to allow this to work for gnuplot. >> I'll address that on the other email. >> >> Ben > > After the discussion on the help-octave thread I decided to give the > attached variant a go with the shrinking workaround for gnuplot + using > FaceColor instead of FaceVertexCData. > It works for me with gnuplot's wxt and x11 terminal and fltk (and also > the experimental qthandles backend which I hope will make its way into > core octave). > I will wait a few days for feedback and then create a bug tracker > feature request and upload a hg patch unless nobody wants to add it to > octave (I have anyway to prepare the missing function shrinkfaces in the > meantime). > > <tetramesh.m> I'm seeing a difference between Matlab and Octave. I've attached results for both demos. Ben
fltk1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
fltk2.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
gnuplot1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
gnuplot2.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
matlab1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
matlab2.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |