[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ? |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:36:21 -0500 |
On 28-Jan-2012, Ben Abbott wrote:
| > Looking at this today, if I do
| >
| > print test.eps '-S1024,768'
| >
| > the bounding box in the eps file is set to 1024x768, but the size of
| > the plot does not fill the bounding box. Instead, it is in the top
| > left corner of the page and occupies about 1/4 of the page area.
| >
| > Is that the correct behavior?
| >
| > jwe
|
|
| No that's not correct.
|
| I see what you describe using fltk, but gnuplot is working correctly
| for me. I assume you only see this for fltk ?
Yes, it seems to work correctly for me with gnuplot.
jwe
- patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/15
- patch to be applied to default or stable ?, John W. Eaton, 2012/01/15
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/15
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/17
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, John W. Eaton, 2012/01/17
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/17
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, John W. Eaton, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, John W. Eaton, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/29