octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Octave 3.6.0-rc0 release candidate available for ftp


From: Martin Helm
Subject: Re: Octave 3.6.0-rc0 release candidate available for ftp
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:24:31 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.37.6-0.9-desktop; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; )

Am Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2012, 01:40:00 schrieb Doug Stewart:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Robinson, Melvin D <
> 
> address@hidden> wrote:
> > Fedora 16 built and checked with no issues.  Building for Lion.
> > 
> > ________________________________________
> > From: address@hidden [
> > address@hidden on behalf of John W. Eaton [
> > address@hidden
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 4:29 PM
> > To: octave maintainers mailing list
> > Subject: Octave 3.6.0-rc0 release candidate available for ftp
> > 
> > The first release candidate of Octave 3.6.0 is now available from
> > 
> > alpha.gnu.org in the directory /gnu/octave:
> >  8916ea8fe675ed6411fed0c92dad272b  octave-3.6.0-rc0.tar.gz
> >  
> >  -rw-r--r-- 1 3003 3002 17976033 Jan 10 22:16 octave-3.6.0-rc0.tar.gz
> > 
> > Even if you have been building Octave regularly from the Mercurial
> > archive, it would help if you could build from this release candidate
> > and report any problems.  We could especially use reports for Windows
> > and OS X systems.
> > 
> > jwe
> 
> I got:
> 
> Summary:
> 
>   PASS  10090
>   FAIL      0
> 
> There were 2 expected failures (see fntests.log for details).
> 
> 
> 
> But I also got 50 skipped tests  which I didn't get for 3.4.92
> all related to sparse.
> 
> >>>>> processing test_sparse
> 
>   ***** testif HAVE_UMFPACK ;# permuted LU
>  [L,U] = lu (bs);
>  assert (L*U, bs, 1e-10);
> ----- skipped test
> 
>   ***** testif HAVE_UMFPACK ;# simple LU + row permutations
>  [L,U,P] = lu (bs);
>  assert (P'*L*U, bs, 1e-10);
>  # triangularity
>  [i,j,v] = find (L);
>  assert (i-j>=0);
>  [i,j,v] = find (U);
>  assert (j-i>=0);
> ----- skipped test
> 
>   ***** testif HAVE_UMFPACK ;# simple LU + row/col permutations
>  [L,U,P,Q] = lu (bs);
>  assert (P'*L*U*Q', bs, 1e-10);
>  # triangularity
>  [i,j,v] = find (L);
>  assert (i-j>=0);
>  [i,j,v] = find (U);
>  assert (j-i>=0);
> ----- skipped test
> 
>   ***** testif HAVE_UMFPACK ;# LU with vector permutations
>  [L,U,P,Q] = lu (bs,'vector');
>  assert (L (P,:)*U (:,Q), bs, 1e-10);
>  # triangularity
>  [i,j,v] = find (L);
>  assert (i-j>=0);
>  [i,j,v] = find (U);
>  assert (j-i>=0);
> ----- skipped test
> 
>   ***** testif HAVE_UMFPACK ;# LU with scaling
>  [L,U,P,Q,R] = lu (bs);
>  assert (R*P'*L*U*Q', bs, 1e-10);
>  # triangularity
>  [i,j,v] = find (L);
>  assert (i-j>=0);
>  [i,j,v] = find (U);
>  assert (j-i>=0);
> ----- skipped test
> 
>   ***** testif HAVE_HDF5 # save hdf5
>  savefile = tmpnam ();
>  as_save = as;
>  save ("-hdf5", savefile, "bf", "as_save", "af");
>  clear as_save;
>  load (savefile, "as_save");
>  unlink (savefile);
>  assert (as_save, sparse(af));
> ----- skipped test
> 
> 
> etc.
> 
> 
> Is this expected???
> 
> Doug

I get the same on openSUSE 11.4 and openSUSE 12.1 (both 64 bit)
due to HAVE_UMFPACK, HAVE_CHOLMOD ...
whereas the libraries are there and the tests were not skipped and passed 
without error with  the last snapshot.
I have to look into that tomorrow.

Summary:

  PASS  10090
  FAIL      0

There were 2 expected failures (see fntests.log for details).

Expected failures are known bugs.  Please help improve Octave
by contributing fixes for them.

There were 50 skipped tests (see fntests.log for details).
Skipped tests are features that are disabled in this version of Octave
because the needed libraries were not present when Octave was built.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]