[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Testing for function handles
From: |
Juan Pablo Carbajal |
Subject: |
Re: Testing for function handles |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Nov 2011 13:08:21 +0100 |
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Dr. Alexander Klein
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Am 09.11.2011 um 11:32 schrieb Juan Pablo Carbajal:
>
>> I get
>> t = 1.0521
>> for strcmp
>> t = 5.0083
>> for isa
>
> It looks pretty much the same under OSX.
>
> Alex
>
> --
> Dr. Alexander Klein, Diplom-Mathematiker
>
> Physiologisches Institut | TransMIT Zentrum
> Raum 543 | für Numerische Methoden
> Aulweg 129 | Heinrich-Buff-Ring 44
> 35392 Giessen | 35392 Giessen
>
>
The solution, that I see, to avoid doing a strcmp is to add the DEFUN
(isfunhandle , ... to the C++ code and return the value of the field
is_function_handle from the octave_value data type.
@Alexander Klein: are you up to do that? If not, I will do it at some
point, but please put it in the tracker not to forget (add me as CC
cause I am not a dev).
--
M. Sc. Juan Pablo Carbajal
-----
PhD Student
University of Zürich
http://ailab.ifi.uzh.ch/carbajal/
- Re: Testing for function handles, (continued)
- Re: Testing for function handles, Richard, 2011/11/09
- Re: Testing for function handles, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2011/11/09
- Re: Testing for function handles, Richard, 2011/11/09
- Re: Testing for function handles, Richard Crozier, 2011/11/09
- Re: Testing for function handles, John W. Eaton, 2011/11/09
- Re: Testing for function handles, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2011/11/09
- Re: Testing for function handles, John W. Eaton, 2011/11/09
- Re: Testing for function handles, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2011/11/09
- Re: Testing for function handles, Dr. Alexander Klein, 2011/11/10
- Re: Testing for function handles, Dr. Alexander Klein, 2011/11/09
- Re: Testing for function handles,
Juan Pablo Carbajal <=