Re: Handling "parfor" as "for"

[John W. Eaton]

On 29-Sep-2011, Søren Hauberg wrote:

| tor, 29 09 2011 kl. 02:58 -0400, skrev John W. Eaton:
| > Now Octave can accept statements of the form
| > 
| >   parfor LHS = EXPR BODY end
| >   parfor ( LHS = EXPR, MAXPROC ) BODY end
| 
| Does it have the corresponding 'end's ? I.e. can I write
| 
|   parfor LHS = EXPR
|     BODY
|   endfor
| 
| or
| 
|   parfor LHS = EXPR
|     BODY
|   endparfor
| 
| ?

Yes.

jwe