[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tests in log-scale plots
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: tests in log-scale plots |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Sep 2011 09:26:49 -0500 |
On 6 September 2011 08:43, c. <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 6 Sep 2011, at 15:07, Ben Abbott wrote:
>
>> I'm off-topic, but for the graphics demos please start with a "clf ()" to
>> ensure reproducible results.
>>
>> Ben
> I prepared the attached changeset that adds the same code both as a
> test and as a demo. I did not push as I find it annoying to have
> octave crash during 'make check'.
>
> On the other hand test are meant to show bugs, so what do you
> suggest? should I push this changeset?
I say you push it. A segfault is annoying, so perhaps if we're all
annoyed, we'll work faster towards fixing this bug. ;-)
Matter of fact, *I* am going to try to fix this segfault right away.
It's nice that you've provided a test that reproducibly causes a
segfault.
- Jordi G. H.
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, (continued)
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, Kai Habel, 2011/09/06
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, Ben Abbott, 2011/09/06
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, Kai Habel, 2011/09/06
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, Ben Abbott, 2011/09/06
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, Kai Habel, 2011/09/06
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, Ben Abbott, 2011/09/06
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, c., 2011/09/07
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, Kai Habel, 2011/09/07
Re: tests in log-scale plots, Ben Abbott, 2011/09/06
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, c., 2011/09/06
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, Ben Abbott, 2011/09/06
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, John W. Eaton, 2011/09/06
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, c., 2011/09/06
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, Ben Abbott, 2011/09/06
tests in log-scale plots, John W. Eaton, 2011/09/06
Re: tests in log-scale plots, Ben Abbott, 2011/09/06