[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mac OS X build reference?
From: |
Jarno Rajahalme |
Subject: |
Re: Mac OS X build reference? |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:28:11 +0200 |
On Feb 17, 2011, at 18:49 , ext fork wrote:
> Richard Campbell <rlcamp.pdx <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> and the resulting
>> patched version of the current Readme.MacOS for fork's sake, so that he can
> get started right away if he desires.
>
> Thanks for this.
>
> Is there any reason not to compile a fresh, recent gcc and atlas (along with
> any
> other dependcies) into /usr/local, update PATH to hit /usr/local/bin first,
> and
> go for it? Will this give me 64 bit?
>
> I think it is easier to take the time to make a perfect little sandbox rather
> than try to dork around with 3 year old patched gcc's and funky veclib's.
>
The patch I posted at http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/index.php?7468 gives you
64-bit. I wraps the funky vecLib BLAS and LAPACK to work with -m64 (and without
-ff2c).
If you use non-apple GCC, you should have the libstdc++ in LDFLAGS, as noted in
README.MacOS section 2.1.
Jarno
Re: Mac OS X build reference?, Richard Campbell, 2011/02/16
Re: Mac OS X build reference?, John W. Eaton, 2011/02/16