octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Improvements in the calculation of text extents


From: Konstantinos Poulios
Subject: Re: Improvements in the calculation of text extents
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 11:56:12 +0200

In the files "changelog-typos.changeset" and
"changelog-tabify.changeset", attached to this mail you can find some
fixes for src/Changelog, concerning respectively the changeset of my
previous mail and an older changeset ecd87194adb6.

Kostas

2010/12/26 Konstantinos Poulios <address@hidden>:
> 2010/12/24 Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso <address@hidden>:
>>> On Dec 22, 2010, at 6:43 AM, logari81 wrote:
>>>
>>>> Currently, the calculation of the extent of text objects in Octave is
>>>> very limited. For example it doesn't take into account the rotation
>>>> angle:
>>>>
>>>> Revision 11407 of Octave:
>>
>> This number doesn't make sense in general. Changeset numbers are local
>> to a repository. While it looks likes people have been making a strong
>> effort to keep the hg history linear, in my view an artficial
>> representation of what's actually happening in development, as soon as
>> you break linearity of the history, it becomes impossible to
>> universally number changesets. In a distributed VCS, this break from
>> linearity will happen sooner or later (in fact, it's already happened
>> a few times, right now buried deep in the history).
>>
>
> yes, I am aware of this property of distributed cvs types. Actually,
> when I refer to version numbers, these do not correspond to my local
> repository but to the official one here:
> http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/
> In this case revision 11407 is:
> http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/ed827ffa5a43
>
>> On 23 December 2010 20:53, Ben Abbott <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> This changeset doesn't apply for me. In particular, some lines from
>>> graphics.cc seem to be different than what is indicated by your
>>> changeset.
>>
>> More telling, the parent node for this changeset is
>> f94a71bf5e88151529c2ee7ecdf10c6f5ad29aa9, which doesn't exist in the
>> Savannah repo.
>
> oups, sorry for this, I tried to merge three commits into one but
> apparently I missed the first one. In the attachment you can find the
> complete version, hopefully with no further errors (I had to recover
> the the first part of the changes from my memory, but it seems to work
> well).
>
>>
>> Kostas, all you have to do is provide the changeset with that hash,
>> which should exist in your local repository. The hg export command
>> lets you specify more than one changeset, so it looks like you have
>> more than one local commit than what you've shared.
>>
>> - Jordi G. H.
>>
>
> Kostas
>

Attachment: changelog-typos.changeset
Description: Binary data

Attachment: changelog-tabify.changeset
Description: Binary data


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]