Re: Undocumented Operator Functions

[Rik]

Judd Storrs wrote:
> 
> The arithmetic operators, comparison operators and boolean operators
> don't seem to be associated to the corresponding functions in the
> documentation. My thought is that I could add corresponding sections
> to the Arithmetic chapter and cross references to the operator
> discussions in the Expressions chapter? Does this seem reasonable? If
> so I'll take on updating the documentation for the functions from the
> list at the end of this message.

I think it would be better just to place them in the Expressions chapter.
The operators would be introduced and then there could be a short sentence
introducing the fact that there are function equivalents to the operators
which sometimes have advantages (for example, when needing to pass a file
handle.  You can pass @eq but not @==).  There is already some precedence
for this in that isequal is documented with the Operators.  And yes, please
go out and document!

> 
> and
> ctranspose
> eq
> ge
> gt
> ldivide
> le
> lt
> minus
> mldivide
> mpower
> mrdivide
> mtimes
> ne
> not
> or
> plus
> power
> rdivide
> times
> transpose
> uminus
> uplus
> 
> 
> --judd
>