octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Logos proposal


From: Thomas Weber
Subject: Re: Logos proposal
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 07:58:18 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:02:23AM +0200, Fotios Kasolis wrote:
> 
> On Jun 14, 2010, at 11:48 PM, Judd Storrs wrote:
> 
> > I like these. My favorites are the top left and bottom right (what I
> > like about the top left one is that it hints at IDL). I like that the
> > bottom right one seems to have a sense of something moving fast toward
> > the right like a train or something.
> > 
> > After a little more thought maybe "free your math" implies some sort
> > of acknowledgement that math can be owned (aka the dreaded IP) that
> > also isn't too
> > compatible with the FSF/GNU ideals. I do like that "Free your ..."
> > casts free into a verb which is unambiguous. Perhaps we need a better
> > target for freedom than "math" though.
> > 
> > What about "Free your numbers"? Owning numbers casts the concept of
> > "owning math" into a ridiculous light and it nods towards some other
> > computing freedom struggles that are important to the FSF such as DRM?
> > 
> > 
> > --judd
> 
> 
> What about those? (I like much the idea of white on black glossy). But the 
> style can change (the "free your...." can also change) but the way Octave is 
> written is that something you like?

I like the glossy part and the way Octave is written. However, the
infinity symbol in the left top corner makes the logo somewhat restless.
So, I'd go for the bottom left one.

        Thomas


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]