[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPU Engine for Octave
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: GPU Engine for Octave |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Dec 2009 15:53:28 -0500 |
On 8-Dec-2009, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
| And what does "recognized" mean? :D
Of course this is not enumerated as the GPL is a legal document...
| AFAIK, Khronos also publishes and maintains OpenGL and a couple of
| other standards, so I suppose it qualifies.
OK.
| "halfway working" would surely not be enough, but otherwise this seems
| allowed if the standard satisfies the GPL demands.
Yes, I agree. My point is just that some care needs to be taken when
evaluating whether a given case is OK or not.
jwe
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, (continued)
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/12/08
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, John W. Eaton, 2009/12/08
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, Judd Storrs, 2009/12/08
- Message not available
- Fwd: GPU Engine for Octave, jaideep singh, 2009/12/08
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, Michael Creel, 2009/12/08
- Message not available
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, John W. Eaton, 2009/12/08
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, Judd Storrs, 2009/12/08
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/12/08
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, John W. Eaton, 2009/12/08
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/12/08
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, Judd Storrs, 2009/12/08
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/12/09
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, Judd Storrs, 2009/12/09
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/12/09