[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnulib and automake
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: gnulib and automake |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:16:10 -0400 |
On 30-Oct-2009, Benjamin Lindner wrote:
| > | looks ok, doesn't it?
| >
| > Yes. Using this configuration, are shared libraries built?
| >
|
| No
|
| I begin to suspect this will not be going to work OOTB. It smells like
| the many bad experiences I have had with libtool when building octave's
| dependency libraries.
What were the problems? How did you solve them (did you)?
In any case, I don't plan to reverse the decision to use libtool and
automake, because I want to be able to use functions from gnulib, and
as far as I can tell, that is just not practical without automake and
libtool.
I can try to help you debug the problems, but you will have to send
more information about exactly what is happening. Or, I need to know
how to duplicate the build environment you have, then I can try to
find a Windows system that I can use to debug the configuration
problems.
jwe
- Re: gnulib and automake, (continued)
Re: gnulib and automake, Benjamin Lindner, 2009/10/30
- Re: gnulib and automake, John W. Eaton, 2009/10/30
- Re: gnulib and automake, Benjamin Lindner, 2009/10/30
- Re: gnulib and automake, John W. Eaton, 2009/10/30
- Re: gnulib and automake, Benjamin Lindner, 2009/10/30
- Re: gnulib and automake,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: gnulib and automake, Benjamin Lindner, 2009/10/31
- Re: gnulib and automake, Benjamin Lindner, 2009/10/31
- Re: gnulib and automake, John W. Eaton, 2009/10/31
- Re: gnulib and automake, Benjamin Lindner, 2009/10/31
Re: gnulib and automake, John W. Eaton, 2009/10/31
Re: gnulib and automake, Benjamin Lindner, 2009/10/31
Re: gnulib and automake, John W. Eaton, 2009/10/31
Re: gnulib and automake, Benjamin Lindner, 2009/10/31
Re: gnulib and automake, John W. Eaton, 2009/10/31
Re: gnulib and automake, Benjamin Lindner, 2009/10/31