[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.2.0 release candidate 6
|
From: |
Marco Atzeri |
|
Subject: |
Re: 3.2.0 release candidate 6 |
|
Date: |
Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:23:51 +0000 (GMT) |
--- Mer 3/6/09, Benjamin Lindner <address@hidden> ha scritto:
> Da: Benjamin Lindner <address@hidden>
> Oggetto: Re: 3.2.0 release candidate 6
> A: "Jaroslav Hajek" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "octave maintainers list" <address@hidden>
> Data: Mercoledì 3 giugno 2009, 19:44
> On 03.06.2009 08:31, Jaroslav Hajek
> wrote:
> > hi all,
> >
> > Octave 3.2.0 RC6 tarballs available at:
> >
> > the changes since RC5 (listed below) are really minor
> (two test fixes,
> > one example fix and a MSVC-specific issue).
> > If you have already tested RC5, there's no need to
> redo using RC6, IMHO.
> > It seems to me that almost all known bugs are now
> fixed (except those
> > classified as platform specific or those we don't know
> how to fix).
> > Unless anyone reports a problem with RC5 or RC6, RC6
> will become the
> > 3.2.0 release, probably on Friday, or during the
> weekend.
> >
>
> Building on mingw32 using tdm-gcc-4.3.0-2 fails with the
> error
>
> ! I can't find file
> `/home/hajek/devel/octave/release-3-2-x/examples/@polynomial/polynomial.m'.
>
> while building documentation.
> removing the file conf.texi from the source tree solves the
> problem and the build runs cleanly.
>
> make check:
>
> Summary:
>
> PASS 5709
> FAIL 9
>
> with the 9 fails in src/data.cc
>
> src\data.cc PASS 500/509 FAIL 9
>
>
> The log output is
>
> >>>>> processing
> d:\files\admin\octaveforge_svn\trunk\octave-forge\admin\Windows\mingw32\octave\octave-3.2.0\src\data.cc
> ***** assert(log2(complex(0,Inf)), Inf + log2(i));
> !!!!! test failed
> assert (log2 (complex (0, Inf)),Inf + log2 (i)) expected
> Inf + 2.266i
> but got
> NaN + 2.266i
> NaNs don't match ***** test
> [f, e] = log2 ([0,-1; 2,-4; Inf,-Inf]);
> assert (f, [0,-0.5; 0.5,-0.5; Inf,-Inf]);
> assert (e, [0,1;2,3;0,0])
> !!!!! test failed
> assert (f,[0, -0.5; 0.5, -0.5; Inf, -Inf]) expected
> 0.00000 -0.50000
> 0.50000 -0.50000
> Inf
> -Inf
> but got
> 0.00000 -0.50000
> 0.50000 -0.50000
> NaN
> NaN
> NaNs don't match ***** test
> [f, e] = log2 (complex (zeros (3, 2), [0,-1; 2,-4;
> Inf,-Inf]));
> assert (f, complex (zeros (3, 2), [0,-0.5; 0.5,-0.5;
> Inf,-Inf]));
> assert (e, [0,1; 2,3; 0,0]);
> !!!!! test failed
> assert (f,complex (zeros (3, 2), [0, -0.5; 0.5, -0.5; Inf,
> -Inf])) expected
> 0.00000 +
> 0.00000i 0.00000 - 0.50000i
> 0.00000 +
> 0.50000i 0.00000 - 0.50000i
> 0.00000 +
> Infi 0.00000 -
> Infi
> but got
> 0.00000 +
> 0.00000i 0.00000 - 0.50000i
> 0.00000 +
> 0.50000i 0.00000 - 0.50000i
> NaN -
> NaNi NaN
> - NaNi
> NaNs don't match ***** assert (sort ([NaN, 1i, -1, 2,
> Inf], "descend"), [NaN, Inf, 2, -1, 1i])
> !!!!! test failed
> assert (sort ([NaN, 1i, -1, 2, Inf], "descend"),[NaN, Inf,
> 2, -1, 1i]) expected
> NaN
> + 0i Inf
> + 0i 2
> + 0i -1
> + 0i 0
> + 1i
> but got
> NaN + 0i
> 2 + 0i -1
> + 0i 0
> + 1i Inf
> + 0i
> Infs don't matchshared variables {
> m2 =
>
> 1 2
> 3 4
>
> flo = 0
> fhi = Inf
> }
> ***** assert (sort ([NaN, 1i, -1, 2, Inf], 2,
> "descend"), [NaN, Inf, 2, -1, 1i])
> !!!!! test failed
> assert (sort ([NaN, 1i, -1, 2, Inf], 2, "descend"),[NaN,
> Inf, 2, -1, 1i]) expected
> NaN
> + 0i Inf
> + 0i 2
> + 0i -1
> + 0i 0
> + 1i
> but got
> NaN + 0i
> 2 + 0i -1
> + 0i 0
> + 1i Inf
> + 0i
> Infs don't matchshared variables {
> m2 =
>
> 1 2
> 3 4
>
> flo = 0
> fhi = Inf
> }
> ***** test
> [v, i] = sort ([NaN, 1i, -1, Inf, 1, 1i]);
> assert (v, [1, 1i, 1i, -1, Inf, NaN])
> assert (i, [5, 2, 6, 3, 4, 1])
> !!!!! test failed
> assert (v,[1, 1i, 1i, -1, Inf, NaN]) expected
> Columns 1 through 5:
>
> 1 + 0i
> 0 + 1i
> 0 + 1i -1
> + 0i Inf
> + 0i
>
> Column 6:
>
> NaN + 0i
> but got
> Columns 1 through 5:
>
> 0 + 1i
> -1 + 0i Inf
> + 0i 1
> + 0i 0
> + 1i
>
> Column 6:
>
> NaN + 0i
> Infs don't matchshared variables {
> m2 =
>
> 1 2
> 3 4
>
> flo = 0
> fhi = Inf
> }
> ***** assert (sort (single([NaN, 1i, -1, 2, Inf]),
> "descend"), single([NaN, Inf, 2, -1, 1i]))
> !!!!! test failed
> assert (sort (single ([NaN, 1i, -1, 2, Inf]),
> "descend"),single ([NaN, Inf, 2, -1, 1i])) expected
> NaN
> + 0i Inf
> + 0i 2
> + 0i -1
> + 0i 0
> + 1i
> but got
> NaN + 0i
> 2 + 0i -1
> + 0i 0
> + 1i Inf
> + 0i
> Infs don't matchshared variables {
> m2 =
>
> 1 2
> 3 4
>
> flo = 0
> fhi = Inf
> }
> ***** assert (sort (single([NaN, 1i, -1, 2, Inf]),
> 2, "descend"), single([NaN, Inf, 2, -1, 1i]))
> !!!!! test failed
> assert (sort (single ([NaN, 1i, -1, 2, Inf]), 2,
> "descend"),single ([NaN, Inf, 2, -1, 1i])) expected
> NaN
> + 0i Inf
> + 0i 2
> + 0i -1
> + 0i 0
> + 1i
> but got
> NaN + 0i
> 2 + 0i -1
> + 0i 0
> + 1i Inf
> + 0i
> Infs don't matchshared variables {
> m2 =
>
> 1 2
> 3 4
>
> flo = 0
> fhi = Inf
> }
> ***** test
> [v, i] = sort (single([NaN, 1i, -1, Inf, 1, 1i]));
> assert (v, single([1, 1i, 1i, -1, Inf, NaN]))
> assert (i, [5, 2, 6, 3, 4, 1])
> !!!!! test failed
> assert (v,single ([1, 1i, 1i, -1, Inf, NaN])) expected
> Columns 1 through 5:
>
> 1 + 0i
> 0 + 1i
> 0 + 1i -1
> + 0i Inf
> + 0i
>
> Column 6:
>
> NaN + 0i
> but got
> Columns 1 through 5:
>
> 0 + 1i
> -1 + 0i Inf
> + 0i 1
> + 0i 0
> + 1i
>
> Column 6:
>
> NaN + 0i
> Infs don't matchshared variables {
> m2 =
>
> 1 2
> 3 4
>
> flo = 0
> fhi = Inf
> }
>
>
>
> The 6 sorting fails I guess are similar to the ones seen on
> cygwin (but there are 7 fails reported?)
> The first 3 look like a math-lib bug in mingw32. I guess we
> have to live with them.
>
> benjamin
>
the failing tests on cygwin are:
***** assert(log2(complex(0,Inf)), Inf + log2(i));
!!!!! test failed
assert (log2 (complex (0, Inf)),Inf + log2 (i)) expected
Inf + 2.266i
but got
NaN + 2.266i
NaNs don't match ***** assert (sort ([NaN, 1i, -1, 2, Inf], "descend"), [NaN,
Inf, 2, -1,
1i])
!!!!! test failed
assert (sort ([NaN, 1i, -1, 2, Inf], "descend"),[NaN, Inf, 2, -1, 1i]) expected
NaN + 0i Inf + 0i 2 + 0i -1 + 0i 0 + 1i
but got
NaN + 0i 2 + 0i -1 + 0i 0 + 1i Inf + 0i
Infs don't matchshared variables {
m2 =
1 2
3 4
flo = 0
fhi = Inf
}
***** assert (sort ([NaN, 1i, -1, 2, Inf], 2, "descend"), [NaN, Inf, 2, -1,
1i])
!!!!! test failed
assert (sort ([NaN, 1i, -1, 2, Inf], 2, "descend"),[NaN, Inf, 2, -1, 1i])
expected
NaN + 0i Inf + 0i 2 + 0i -1 + 0i 0 + 1i
but got
NaN + 0i 2 + 0i -1 + 0i 0 + 1i Inf + 0i
Infs don't matchshared variables {
m2 =
1 2
3 4
flo = 0
fhi = Inf
}
***** test
[v, i] = sort ([NaN, 1i, -1, Inf, 1, 1i]);
assert (v, [1, 1i, 1i, -1, Inf, NaN])
assert (i, [5, 2, 6, 3, 4, 1])
!!!!! test failed
assert (v,[1, 1i, 1i, -1, Inf, NaN]) expected
1 + 0i 0 + 1i 0 + 1i -1 + 0i Inf + 0i NaN + 0i
but got
0 + 1i -1 + 0i Inf + 0i 1 + 0i 0 + 1i NaN + 0i
Infs don't matchshared variables {
m2 =
1 2
3 4
flo = 0
fhi = Inf
}
***** assert (sort (single([NaN, 1i, -1, 2, Inf]), "descend"), single([NaN,
Inf, 2, -1,
1i]))
!!!!! test failed
assert (sort (single ([NaN, 1i, -1, 2, Inf]), "descend"),single ([NaN, Inf, 2,
-1, 1i])) e
xpected
NaN + 0i Inf + 0i 2 + 0i -1 + 0i 0 + 1i
but got
NaN + 0i 2 + 0i -1 + 0i 0 + 1i Inf + 0i
Infs don't matchshared variables {
m2 =
1 2
3 4
flo = 0
fhi = Inf
}
***** assert (sort (single([NaN, 1i, -1, 2, Inf]), 2, "descend"),
single([NaN, Inf, 2, -
1, 1i]))
!!!!! test failed
assert (sort (single ([NaN, 1i, -1, 2, Inf]), 2, "descend"),single ([NaN, Inf,
2, -1, 1i])
) expected
NaN + 0i Inf + 0i 2 + 0i -1 + 0i 0 + 1i
but got
NaN + 0i 2 + 0i -1 + 0i 0 + 1i Inf + 0i
Infs don't matchshared variables {
m2 =
1 2
3 4
flo = 0
fhi = Inf
}
***** test
[v, i] = sort (single([NaN, 1i, -1, Inf, 1, 1i]));
assert (v, single([1, 1i, 1i, -1, Inf, NaN]))
assert (i, [5, 2, 6, 3, 4, 1])
!!!!! test failed
assert (v,single ([1, 1i, 1i, -1, Inf, NaN])) expected
1 + 0i 0 + 1i 0 + 1i -1 + 0i Inf + 0i NaN + 0i
but got
0 + 1i -1 + 0i Inf + 0i 1 + 0i 0 + 1i NaN + 0i
Infs don't matchshared variables {
m2 =
1 2
3 4
flo = 0
fhi = Inf
}
All are related to the lack of a complete set of C99
complex functions in newlib (cygwin substitute of glibc).
Regards
Marco