octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: new branch?


From: Ben Abbott
Subject: Re: new branch?
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:13:41 -0400


On Jun 3, 2009, at 10:09 AM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Ben Abbott <address@hidden> wrote:
John / Jaroslav,

I see an unexpected branch in the sources at rev 9284. The branch is more like a stub as it only contains two changesets. Both of them are mine.

Revision: 9285
Branch: default
Author: Ben Abbott <address@hidden>  2009-05-29 21:46:43
Committer: Ben Abbott <address@hidden>  2009-05-29 21:46:43
Parent: 9284:d8becc6d0a18 (__scatter__.m: If the color spec is empty, set
using __next_line_color__.)

__gnuplot_has_feature__.m: Change version for "x11_figure_position" from
">=4.3.0" to ">=4.2.5".

Revision: 9284
Branch: default
Author: Ben Abbott <address@hidden>  2009-05-29 20:46:34
Committer: Ben Abbott <address@hidden>  2009-05-29 20:46:34
Parent: 9283:38ad8c99d6a2 (__gnuplot_get_var__.m: insert missing semicolon) Child: 9285:692c5a6ab019 (__gnuplot_has_feature__.m: Change version for
"x11_figure_position" from ">=4.3.0" to ">=4.2.5".)

__scatter__.m: If the color spec is empty, set using __next_line_color__.

I'm not very good with mercurial, and am only came across the problem when I
did "hg view".

Do you see these changesets in your archive?

Ben


No, I think neither of these is present, at least the IDs can't be
found. Probably you pulled and forgot to merge or rebase (rebasing is
preferred).

regards

Ok. Thanks. I'll try to fix my end tomorrow and then push these changes.

Ben




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]