[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:35:09 -0400 |
On 8-Apr-2009, Svante Signell wrote:
| I'll try to clarify: If we develop entirely for use in Matlab and not in
| Octave it doesn't matter much if the library code is GPLed or not. We
| would probably be fully proprietary then, an no .m files or .mex files
| would be free. There is not much difference if the code only runs in
| Matlab. This is not our wish however, and we would like to make the
| toolbox run in both Matlab and Octave as well as in *nix and PC
| environments.
What prevents you from writing free software that works with both
Octave and Matlab?
jwe
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, (continued)
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, Judd Storrs, 2009/04/09
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, Judd Storrs, 2009/04/09
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, John W. Eaton, 2009/04/20
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, Judd Storrs, 2009/04/20
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, John W. Eaton, 2009/04/21
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, David Bateman, 2009/04/21
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, Judd Storrs, 2009/04/21
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, David Bateman, 2009/04/08
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, Judd Storrs, 2009/04/08
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, John W. Eaton, 2009/04/08
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing,
John W. Eaton <=
Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, Judd Storrs, 2009/04/07
Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, John W. Eaton, 2009/04/08
Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, Judd Storrs, 2009/04/08
Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, Judd Storrs, 2009/04/08