[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
R: patch for cygwin installation
From: |
Marco Atzeri |
Subject: |
R: patch for cygwin installation |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Mar 2009 07:54:05 +0000 (GMT) |
--- Dom 29/3/09, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> ha scritto:
> Da: John W. Eaton <address@hidden>
> Oggetto: R: patch for cygwin installation
> A: "Marco Atzeri" <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Data: Domenica 29 marzo 2009, 05:33
> On 28-Mar-2009, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>
> | in almost all the system, the two are equals
> |
> | SHLLIBPRE=lib
> | SHLBINPRE=lib
> |
> | so
> |
> | $(SHLLIBPRE)octinterp.$(SHLLIB)
> | $(SHLBINPRE)octinterp.$(SHLLIB)
> |
> | are also equal.
>
> On systems where they are the same, then why would we need
> both names?
> In that case, I think we should only define one of them.
>
> In any case, the names should be consistently used. I
> didn't see that
> your patch was doing that, but maybe I misunderstood.
>
> jwe
>
I thought a bit and you are right.
Scrap the full thing I will remake it with the following:
$(SHLPRE)octinterp.$(SHLEXT)
$(LIBPRE)octinterp.$(SHLLIB)
$(LIBPRE)octinterp.$(SHLBIN)
These names should be consistent and we do not need
$(SHLBINPRE) and $(SHLLIBPRE) any more
An almost all the the system
$(SHLPRE) = lib
$(LIBPRE)= lib
on cygwin
$(SHLPRE) = cyg
$(LIBPRE)= lib
Do you agree ?
Marco