[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: octave presentation, part 2
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: octave presentation, part 2 |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:08:13 -0500 |
On 20-Nov-2008, Ben Abbott wrote:
| I would think a simple rewording to "open source-code" would be
| sufficient to dodge the issue, no?
What issue are you trying to dodge?
Part of agreeing to make Octave an "official" GNU project is promoting
the ideals of the GNU project. You are free to use the terms you
prefer, but we should not use terms like "open source" in the Octave
documentation, and I'm asking you to consider saying "free software"
instead when speaking about Octave.
jwe
- Re: octave presentation, part 2, (continued)
- octave presentation, part 2, John W. Eaton, 2008/11/19
- Re: octave presentation, part 2, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/11/19
- Re: octave presentation, part 2, John W. Eaton, 2008/11/19
- Re: octave presentation, part 2, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2008/11/19
- Re: octave presentation, part 2, John W. Eaton, 2008/11/19
- Re: octave presentation, part 2, David Bateman, 2008/11/20
- Re: octave presentation, part 2, Ben Abbott, 2008/11/20
- Re: octave presentation, part 2,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: octave presentation, part 2, Przemek Klosowski, 2008/11/20
- Re: octave presentation, part 2, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/11/20
Re: octave presentation, part 2, Ben Abbott, 2008/11/19
Re: octave presentation, part 2, Ben Abbott, 2008/11/20